![]() Earlier in the year, when xCloud was in beta, Microsoft was only able to provide one game - Halo: The Master Chief Collection - for testing on iOS devices, in stark contrast to the tens of games released for the Android beta. There was also Microsoft's own history with Apple to consider. It would mean that games using the Unreal Engine would no longer be updated, so existing bugs and glitches wouldn't be fixable. Microsoft alleged that this would have a catastrophic effect for games on iOS devices that relied on the Unreal Engine. Microsoft filed a letter of support for Epic's lawsuit against Apple, which mainly centred around Apple's decision to block Epic from accessing the Unreal Engine and updating it for iOS devices. Interestingly enough, Microsoft was vocal in its support of Epic's lawsuit against Apple. ![]() Microsoft files support for Epic against Apple ![]() It all boils down to this: Epic's lawsuit is aimed at getting their own storefront onto iOS devices, separate from the App Store, which would in turn open up similar options for other developers. Filing a lawsuit against Apple in California, Epic asserted that it would launch its own app storefront on iOS devices, were it not for Apple's policies.Įpic stated that it felt obligated to charge more for V-Buck purchases on iOS devices due to Apple's transaction fees through the App Store. The Nineteen Eighty Fortnite video took a bit of attention away from Epic's ensuing lawsuit against Apple. Positioning itself as a corporation that could fight another corporation over dominance of the market, Epic took the fight right back to Apple after Fortnite was delisted from the App Store. Apple will also argue that the original court made an error when implementing an injunction that will force App Store changes.Īpple claims that because it was not found to be engaging in anticompetitive behavior, the App Store rules are not unfair and the district court did not have the authority to mandate an injunction.The Nineteen Eighty Fortnite video was certainly a statement from Epic. Epic, says Apple, made far-reaching claims at the edges of antitrust law, and there is no basis for the ruling to be overturned on appeal. Epic Games will argue that the court made "multiple legal errors" in its initial ruling, once again arguing for sideloading to be allowed.Īpple maintains that Epic Games lost the trial because of "unprecedented" and "unfounded" accusations of anticompetitive conduct that ultimately did not sway the judge. Apple won the antitrust suit, but was ordered to allow developers to add in-app links to outside websites where payments could be accepted.Īpple does not want to change its App Store rules and also appealed, leading to the court battle today. Epic Games aimed to get the court to allow for third-party app stores and alternate methods of getting apps on iOS devices, but Epic Games largely lost the lawsuit, leading it to file an appeal. Apple quickly pulled the Fortnite app from the App Store, and Epic Games was ready with an antitrust lawsuit over Apple's App Store rules. Apple saga started way back in 2020 when Epic Games started allowing Fortnite players to make purchases directly in the app, skirting the in-app purchase rules. ![]() The ongoing legal battle between Apple and Epic Games resumed today, with lawyers for both companies meeting in the United States Court of Appeals to attempt to get the initial ruling from last year overturned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |